These rules concern a service called Documentary Instruments Dispute Resolution Expertise (DOCDEX) which is available in connection with any dispute. Docdex is one of the options available to solve letter of credit disputes. settled under the DOCDEX Decision in accordance with the ICC DOCDEX Rules, ICC. These rules concern a service called Documentary Instruments Dispute Resolution Expertise (DOCDEX) which is available in connection.
|Published (Last):||19 December 2012|
|PDF File Size:||9.53 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.59 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Across the world, banks and businesses engage in commercial dealings for considerable amounts and under a broad variety of terms.
DOCDEX rules—what will rule changes mean in practice? – Lexis®PSL, pra
They expect their dealings to self-liquidate in a peaceful conclusion that would both be profitable to the parties and an incitation to engage into further dealings. From time to time, however, disagreements may emerge on a point of law or fact, and points of view or interests may differ between the parties. Good faith negotiation often takes care of the difference.
But some disagreements evolve into a dispute and need to be submitted to a neutral forum for resolution. It would be wrong however to consider that resorting to court litigation or to binding arbitration to put an end to the dispute is a fatality.
Dicdex can take the form of any of the alternative dispute resolution methods ADR where a neutral third person gives her expert riles as to what a just solution would be. In docdxe, an ADR decision is not binding.
This essential characteristic frees the third person facilitating the settlement from the rigid shackles of due process and allows her to devise a flexible approach to communicating with the parties and expressing her views. In choosing an ADR, the parties compromise in no manner on their position. But they avoid turning into enemies as is unfortunately the case when the dispute is submitted to courts. Dispute settlement becomes a friendly act!
This document is available in the following Practice Areas
First issued inand revised inthe rules for Documentary Credit Dispute Resolution by Expertise gradually rupes to become a trusted dispute resolution system for documentary credits, demand guarantees xocdex collections that are governed by ICC Banking Commission rules.
Over the years, the original rules showed their limits whether in terms of managing the expert appointment process, dealing with unwarranted delays or struggling to find an answer to unexpected procedural challenges. But a more perennial solution needed to be found and implemented.
It could only be brought by a comprehensive revision of the rules, in both their scope and administration. Originally, DOCDEX was limited to interpreting and applying Banking Commission rules in a disputed context where the dodex are prevented by the existence of the dispute from submitting a query for an official Commission opinion.
This was either the result of a lack of Banking Commission rules dedicated to a particular type of transactions, as in the case of trade loans, syndications, negotiable instruments, risk purchase agreements or countertrade, or because the dispute concerned an aspect of the transaction that was not covered in the relevant ICC rules, such as authority, conflicts of priority, governing law or fraud in a letter of credit.
Not only has this restrictive approach caused frustration to parties declared to be ineligible to the DOCDEX system, but it was difficult to justify when seeing the wealth of expertise that the Banking Commission enjoys in trade finance in general, far beyond the rules that it has so far issued.
Building rulez the untapped expertise in the Commission, the new DOCDEX rules enjoy an enlarged scope that make them available to any trade finance-related dispute whether or not a set of Banking Commission rules applies. The appointment of experts process was profoundly revised.
Prospective experts are now required to state from the inception their availability, independence and impartiality to serve as appointed experts. If any expert fails to abide by the rules, the Center is empowered to replace him. The Technical Advisor enjoys new enlarged powers, including in terms of scrutinizing the decision.
To that end, his independence will also be verified at the outset by the Center. A number of ethical safeguards are added to the process to ensure that a person having served as DOCDEX expert is barred from any further involvement in the dispute under any other capacity. Moreover, in the interest of transparency, but also of standardization and education, redacted DOCDEX decisions will be published more regularly and promptly after being rendered.
DOCDEX – ICC – International Chamber of Commerce
The new rules offer a new approach to the various submissions and communications by imposing the principle of electronic submissions according to standard templates available on-line. This change is expected to curb administrative delays and ultimately result in faster and better processed proceedings.
They have brilliantly passed the test of rulws broad variety of disputes. This is the case of the non-binding character of a DOCDEX decision unless the ruules otherwise agree in their contract or at rkles stage of the dispute. It is also the case of the respective contributions by the Technical Advisor and the Center to the appointment of experts process.
They come into force on 1 May and are immediately available for use by banks and their customers in relation to trade finance disputes.